How business incubators differ from startup gas pedals

Incubator and gas pedal are two different models of startup support that differ in terms of timeframe, goals and working methods. Incubators are designed to support at the idea stage and can work with a project for up to 24 months, providing office space and basic mentoring. Gas pedals focus on rapid growth of finished products in 3-6 months and often culminate in a presentation to investors.

Before delving into a comparison of startup support models, we recommend exploring the basic aspects of incubation activities:

What is an early stage business incubator and how does it work?

An early-stage incubator helps turn an idea into a working business model through long-term support from 6 to 24 months. Unlike gas pedals, incubators do not have a rigid schedule - each project develops at its own pace, receiving mentorship and training throughout the program.

Imagine an incubator as a medical residency for doctors: the duration of the program allows for practical training under the supervision of experienced mentors, where the main thing is not speed, but the quality of mastering skills. Business incubation also works: a startup gets time to study the market, test hypotheses and find a sustainable monetization model.

For startups considering the Polish market, it is important to consider not only the quality of the support program, but also the administrative aspects of doing business. We offer comprehensive solutions for starting a business in Polandwhich includes both incubation support and EOR services for international teams.

Incubators provide physical workspace, access to basic infrastructure, legal assistance in launching the product and regular consultations with mentors. According to a study by the Polish Agency for Entrepreneurship Development, 73% startups incubated in Poland are still operating 3 years after launch, compared to 27% among those that developed independently.

Case: An IT student from Jagiellonian University developed an algorithm for recognizing emotions by voice, but did not know how to monetize the technology. In the Krakow Technology Park incubator, over 14 months the team conducted 47 interviews with potential customers, tested 5 different business models and created an MVP for call centers. Result: they attracted the first 8 corporate clients with monthly revenue of PLN 23,000.

Expert Tip: The main mistake startups make is to rush to scale. In an incubator, you have time to test hypotheses and find the right business model. Do not rush to move to a gas pedal to grow your startup until you are sure that the market really needs your product.

What is a gas pedal for startup growth?

Startup Growth Accelerator is an intensive 3-6 month program for startups with a ready-made product, aimed at fast support at the scale-up stage and attracting investments. The program term ends with Demo Day - a presentation in front of 50-150 potential investors.

The gas pedal works like intensive therapy in medicine: a short period of maximally concentrated exposure to achieve rapid, measurable results. The intensity of support here is maximum - if the incubator is a marathon, the gas pedal is a hundred-meter race at top speed.

Key features of the gas pedals include entry conditions with strict selection (accepting 1-5% applications), weekly meetings with 3-5 industry mentors, intensive sales workshops and capital provision, access to an ecosystem of 200-500 program graduates and capital provision. According to Startup Poland, 67% graduates of top gas pedals attract seed investment within 6 months after graduating from the program.

The main compromise of gas pedals: for the sake of access to world-class expertise and a network of investors, founders sacrifice 5-10% shares in an early-stage company, when its valuation may be as low as 200-500 thousand PLN.

From business centers to modern support ecosystems

Until the 2000s, support for startups in Poland was limited to simply renting space in business centers at 25-40 zlotys per square meter per month. Entrepreneurs received only a place to work without expert assistance or mentoring.

The main disadvantage of this model is the complete isolation of startups. Statistics showed that 87% of new companies closed in the first 3 years of existence due to lack of systemic support and access to the experience of successful entrepreneurs.

Business Incubator and Accelerator: Evolution

In 2003-2008, technoparks appeared - an attempt to unite startups with universities through "Akademickich Inkubatorów Przedsiębiorczości" programs. However, this model turned out to be too academic: the average decision-making cycle was 6-9 months against the necessary 2-4 weeks for IT startups.

Modern incubators and gas pedals (the first in Poland - Innovation Nest, launched in 2010) emerged as a response to the need for structured, hands-on support. They combined physical space, expertise and direct access to capital in one program with measurable KPIs.

Comparison of business incubators and startup gas pedals

Criterion incubator Gas pedal
Startup phase Idea or prototype Finished product with users
Duration 6-24 months 3-6 months.
Selection percentage 20-30% 1-5%
Investments Rarely Often (50-250 thousand PLN)
Share in the company 0-5% 5-10%
Training format Flexible, personalized Intensive, group
Final event Absent Demo Day with investors
Time costs 20-30 hours/week 60-80 hours/week

What is the difference between gas pedals and business incubators becomes obvious when analyzing the profile of the participants and the requirements for startups.

Gas pedal VS incubator

Who is the incubator suitable for?

The incubator is ideal for teams at the idea or early prototype stage, ready to spend 6-24 months on systematic market research. It is the right choice if you have an interesting concept, but no clear understanding of the target audience and monetization methods.

Requirements for startup teams in incubators include tech students with a working prototype, industry professionals with expertise but no entrepreneurial experience, teams with a B2B product that requires a long sales and validation cycle.

By choosing an incubator for the sake of long-term support, you sacrifice speed to market and early access to investment. The main trade-off: slow but systematic development vs. fast results with high risks.

Who should choose the differences between a business incubator and a business gas pedal?

The difference between business incubators and startup gas pedals becomes clear when analyzing the requirements for participants. A gas pedal is suitable for teams with a ready product and first paying customers, ready to work 60+ hours a week for the sake of rapid international scaling. Minimum entry threshold: 100+ active users, understanding of unit economics and willingness to radically change the product.

Ideal candidates are startups with 15%+ monthly user growth, teams with technical or product backgrounds, projects with $1M+ revenue potential per year and ready for international expansion within 12 months.

Case: A fintech startup from Gdansk developed an API for instant transfers between banks, had 1,200 active users and monthly revenue of PLN 18,000. In Techstars Warsaw gas pedal, the team increased the number of partner banks from 3 to 12 in 4 months, implemented automated onboarding and launched B2B sales. Result: raised a seed round of PLN 1.2 million, increased revenue to PLN 67,000 per month.

Expert Tip: Before applying to a gas pedal, make sure your unit economics are working. Without basic metrics - LTV above 150 PLN, CAC below 50 PLN, retention rate 40%+ after 90 days - it is very difficult to make a scaling plan.

What mistakes startups most often make when choosing a program: differences between a business incubator and a business gas pedal

Mistake 1: Submitting to gas pedal with too raw an idea

Teams apply to prestigious gas pedals with only an idea or a basic prototype without testing on real users. This happens because it seems that the support of a renowned gas pedal will help develop the product faster and attract investment immediately.

The price of a mistake is critical: gas pedals select less than 5% applications, focusing on products ready for growth. Teams with raw ideas are rejected and lose 3-6 months that could have been spent on product development in the incubator. According to Polish Startup Report 2023, teams that are rejected from gas pedals and do not move to incubators are 340% more likely to close a project within a year.

Mistake 2: Ignoring incubators in pursuit of "quick success"

Founders see incubators as a "slow" path and go straight to gas pedals or directly seek investment. Media coverage of gas pedal success stories gives the impression that gas pedals are the only path to rapid growth.

Without fundamental preparation, 85% startups close in the first 2 years. Incubators reduce this figure to 27% through systematic work on the business model. Startup Genome research shows that teams that skip the incubation stage spend 64% more to attract their first customers and make an average of 2.3 critical product strategy mistakes vs. 0.8 for incubator graduates.

Mistake 3: Incorrectly assessing the team's readiness for intensive work

Teams apply to gas pedals without understanding the real intensity of the program and time requirements. Gas pedal programs are positioned as "training", which creates a false impression of a comfortable pace of work.

The gas pedal requires full immersion - 60-80 hours of work per week, weekly presentations of results, constant experimentation with the product. Unprepared teams show poor results: only 23% participants who could not keep up with the pace of the program attract investments within a year against 67% for full-fledged graduates. Additional cost: reputational risks in the investment community.

Comparison of business incubators and startup gas pedals: main mistakes

Alternative development path without support programs

There is a belief in the entrepreneurial community that a successful startup can be built without participating in incubators or gas pedals. Supporters point to companies like WhatsApp (sold to Facebook for $19 billion) or Basecamp, which developed independently.

The main arguments against support programs are that they can slow development due to bureaucratic procedures, divert the team's focus away from the product to "playing to investors," and cause 5-10% to lose its stake in the company without proportionate benefit. Critics note that standardized programs may not be appropriate for niche B2B products or high-tech solutions with long development cycles.

This approach can be effective for serial entrepreneurs with an extensive network of contacts, deep understanding of the target market and access to equity capital from 200-500 thousand PLN. However, research by the Polish fund Market One Capital shows: startups that have undergone high-quality support programs have 2.8 times higher chances of attracting serious investments and are 43% more likely to survive the first 3 years of operation.

Engineering nuances: what goes on "under the hood" of support programs

The effectiveness of incubators and gas pedals depends on several technical factors that are rarely discussed publicly.

A mentor-startup matchmaking algorithm: The best programs use a system similar to Netflix's recommendation algorithms. There are 35-45 mentors for every 10 startups in the cohort. The system automatically analyzes 12 parameters (industry, product stage, team size, target market) and creates optimal pairs. Proper matching increases a startup's probability of success by 67%.

The "time to first pivot" metric: Top gas pedals track how quickly startups make significant changes in product strategy. The optimal time is 3-4 weeks. Too fast (1-2 weeks) means insufficient preparation. Too slow (7+ weeks) means low experimental activity.

The "critical mass cohort" effect: Research shows that startups in groups of 8-12 companies perform better on 40%s than cohorts of 15+ participants. The reason: smaller groups form deeper connections and collaboration and networking between the teams.

The phenomenon of "intensity gradation": The most successful programs use the principle of load gradation - the first 20% of program time is devoted to adaptation, the middle 60% - to intensive work, the last 20% - to preparation for presentations. Programs with an evenly distributed workload show 25% worse results.

Demo Day Algorithm: The order of presentations at the final Demo Day is not accidental. Eye-tracking studies show that investors are most attentive from the 3rd to the 8th presentation. Therefore, the organizers place the most promising startups in this "window of maximum attention".

How to choose the right support program: gas pedal VS incubator?

Gas pedal VS incubator - the choice should be based on an objective assessment of the current state of your project, not on ambition or external attractiveness of the program.

A checklist for choosing an incubator:

  • You have an idea but no clear idea of your target audience
  • The product is in the prototype or MVP stage
  • The team is willing to work 6-24 months to develop the concept
  • No experience in running a business or launching products
  • It takes time to research the market and find a business model

A checklist for choosing a gas pedal:

  • The product is already used by real customers (at least 100+ active users)
  • There is an understanding of unit economics and key metrics
  • The team is ready to work 60+ hours per week intensively
  • The product has international scaling potential
  • Investment required for rapid growth

When choosing between different support programs, it is worth paying attention to providers that offer not only mentorship but also a full range of services for startup development, including dealing with international employment issues.

Landscape of incubators and gas pedals in Poland

Leading incubators:

  • Krakow Technology Park - focus on IT and biotechnology, programs for up to 18 months
  • Gdansk Science and Technology Park - marine technology and logistics
  • Innovation Nest - early-stage projects in fintech and AI
  • Startup Hub Poland (Warsaw) - universal program with access to corporate clients

Top Accelerators:

  • Techstars Warsaw - international program with demo day in USA, investment up to $120K
  • Google for Startups - for AI and machine learning projects
  • Startup Wise Guys - B2B SaaS and cybersecurity specialization
  • bValue - fintech and insurtech, connections with major banks

Expert Tip: Don't choose a program based on brand volume alone. Examine the alumni portfolios from the last 3 years, look at their actual results. A good program is one where 60%+ graduates are still working a year after graduation.

Alternative models of startup support

In addition to traditional incubators and gas pedals, alternative models of entrepreneurship support are developing in Poland.

Corporate gas pedals - programs of large companies (PKN Orlen, Orange, PZU) to find innovative solutions. Advantage: direct access to the market with 2-5 million customers and ready infrastructure. Main trade-off: limited freedom in choosing the direction of development and dependence on the strategic priorities of the corporation.

Startup studios - a model where a team of experts helps create startups from scratch, taking care of technical development, marketing and investment raising. Founders receive a smaller stake in the company (usually 20-40%) in exchange for professional support and a ready-made team.

community-driven incubation - development through entrepreneurial communities and co-working spaces without formal programs. By choosing maximum flexibility and control, founders sacrifice a structured process and guaranteed access to expertise.

Financial aspects of program participation

When choosing a support program, it is important to understand not only the direct investment but also the hidden financial aspects of participation. Reporting and project monitoring also differ between programs.

Incubators in Poland

  • Most don't take a stake in the company
  • Average cost of participation: 2000-5000 PLN per program
  • Alternative cost: 6-24 months without basic income
  • ROI: 70% participants successfully launch a product vs. 30% independent startups

Gas pedals

  • Investment: 50-250 thousand PLN for 5-10% shares
  • Hidden costs: moving to another city (5000-8000 PLN/month), intensive business trips
  • Alternative cost: 3-6 months of full immersion
  • ROI: 40%s attract the next round of investments within a year

The main compromise of gas pedals is that for the sake of access to world-class expertise, founders sacrifice a stake in a company at an early stage, when its valuation may be only 200-500 thousand PLN. In 2-3 years, the same stake may be worth 10-20 times more.

International expansion: how support programs help to enter global markets

Polish startups have a significant advantage: the country's membership in the EU opens access to a market of 450 million consumers without additional regulatory barriers.

A case study of international expansion: Fintech startup Allegro Pay, accelerated by bValue, launched its product in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania in 8 months after Demo Day with a cumulative revenue of 340,000 euros per month. The key success factor was mentoring support from executives with experience in international expansion in financial services.

Top gas pedals provide access to partner programs in other European countries, connections with local distributors, legal support in adapting the product to local legislation and networking with international investors.

The main trade-off of international expansion through gas pedals: the need to standardize the product to "pan-European" requirements, which may limit the possibilities of deep local customization and unique features for the Polish market.

Conclusion: gas pedal or incubator?

Gas pedal or incubator - the choice is determined by the current stage of your startup's development, the team's readiness for intensive work and the company's long-term goals.

Incubator is suitable for teams with an idea or early prototype that need time to research the market and create a working business model. Gas pedal is the right choice for startups with a ready product and first customers, ready to scale quickly.

Participating in a quality support program increases your chances of success by 2.8 times, but only if you choose the right model that fits the current needs of your business. Don't rush into acceleration - it is better to spend extra time in the incubator to build a strong foundation than to fail due to premature scaling.

The Polish market offers quality support programs at all stages of startup development. Your task is to honestly assess the readiness of your product and team in order to choose the program that will accelerate your path to success as much as possible.

Feedback from our clients

Damien Vice Profile Picture

Damien Vice

02/11/2025

Ставлю 1 звезду. Планировал начать сотрудничество через икнубатор. Отправил 3 письма, через мейл и форму на сайте, написал в инсте, сделал 2 звонка (без ответа). Потратил неделю на ожидание. Меня просто проигнорировали. Как можно доверять этому сервису, если фонд не в состоянии ответить на письмо и прислать документы для ознакомления. Жду объяснения

Andrii Melnychuk Profile Picture

Andrii Melnychuk

26/08/2025

I highly recommend Łatwy Start! Thanks to them, my two kids and I received 3-year residence cards without any stress. Special thanks to manager Kristina — she was extremely helpful and even managed to speed up the process for my children. Excellent service, very satisfied!

Anton Mezhuiev Profile Picture

Anton Mezhuiev

26/08/2025

Чудова робота, все відбулося швидко і дуже професійно, з чіткими інструкціями і нотатками про ті документи, що вимагалося надати з моєї сторони — і як саме їх правильно заповнювати. Запис на подачу і видача самої карти зайняла набагато меньше часу, ніж спочатку очікувалося (перше звернення у січні, подача документів і відбитків в березні — а в серпні вже отримав пластік).

Брав пакет з повним супроводом — ні разу не пожалкував, всім рекомендую — і дуже дякую всій компанії і зокрема менеджеру Кристині!

Anastasiya Balotnikava Profile Picture

Anastasiya Balotnikava

26/08/2025

Недавно получила вторую карту с Łatwy Start, как и в первый раз – все было отлично, положительная децизия по итогу.

Благодарю менеджера Кристину за работу и своевременное напоминание про все нужные шаги, довольна совместной работой ✨

Inna Profile Picture

Inna

03/08/2025

3 раза членами семьи сотрудничали с компанией по получению карт побыта в разное время и работали с разными специалистами. До этого были попытки с другими компаниями , но именно высочайший уровень профессионализма Latwy Start сделал нас постоянными клиентами. Каждый раз самое благоприятное впечатление за высокий уровень профессиональной работы и моральную поддержку. Особая отдельная благодарность Ольге! Ольга очень помогла, всегда на связи по любым вопросам, отличные профессиональные советы на каждом этапе, начиная с первого общения еще до заключения договора и до успешного получения карты. Как ангел-хранитель «провела за ручку» через все сложные перепитиии, поддержала словом и делом. Огромная Благодарность Ольге и всей компании! Процветания вам и хоррших клиентов!

Oleksandr Drobyshev Profile Picture

Oleksandr Drobyshev

15/07/2025

Все супер

Yevgeniy Postebailo Profile Picture

Yevgeniy Postebailo

14/07/2025

Всё понравилось, везде сопроводили, всё обьяснили.
Была пара непонятных вещей, но не стесняйтесь спрашивать — всегда отвечают и консультируют.
Рекомендую обращаться.

Aliaksei Seniukovich Profile Picture

Aliaksei Seniukovich

11/07/2025

Хочу выразить огромную благодарность Кристине из Łatwy Start за профессиональную помощь в получении вида на жительство в Польше. Благодаря её опыту, внимательности и доброжелательному отношению весь процесс прошёл легко и без лишнего стресса. Кристина всегда была на связи, подробно отвечала на все вопросы и помогала на каждом этапе оформления документов. Искренне рекомендую её услуги всем, кто ищет надёжную поддержку в решении миграционных вопросов в Польше!

Gennady Bakunovich Profile Picture

Gennady Bakunovich

11/07/2025

I had a really positive experience with Łatwy Start. Manager Kristina was supportive and always ready to help with any questions. I got my temporary residence permit without any issues and with minimal effort on my part. I really appreciate their work and highly recommend them 🙌

Comments

guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments